Waltz Kenneth Structural Realism After Cold War

1000-1200 words. ONLY USE THE PDF INCLUDED AS REFERENCE. Guideline is included as a word document.

Waltz Kenneth Structural Realism After Cold War Article

Basic Features

• It lengths should be between 1,000 to 1,200 words;
• It should be word-processed on A4 format paper;
• It should be 1.5 spaced reader-friendly Time Romans font (12 pt);
• Pages should be numbered;
• It should include a cover page with UNYT logo, title of article review, the name of the student, the date, the month, and academic year;

 

Article Review’s Steps

Step 1: Read the article in its entirety

Note the following:

• What is the central question or issue the article addresses?
• What is the article’s argument or thesis?
• How is the article organized to support this thesis?

 

Step 2: Evaluate the Article

Consider the following questions:

• How and what does this work help us to understand about an issue?
• What types of evidence does the author draw on to support his/her argument?
• What theoretical perspective does the author work from? How does this shape of affect his/her argument?

 

 

Step 3: Write the Review

An article review is an opportunity to critically evaluate a coherent piece of work in its entirety;

It should be structured around the following elements:

1. Introduction;
2. Main Body: Evaluation/Analysis;
3. Conclusion.

 

1. Introduction

• Introduction should be a concise summary of the article’s most important arguments,
• Open with general description of topic/problem addressed in the work;
• Background: question or topic addressed.

 

2. Main body: Evaluation/Analysis

This section should form the bulk of your review.

• It should be a critical evaluation of the arguments, theoretical framework, and empirical examples used in the article;
• State your opinion by providing a reasoned argument,
• Backed up by reference to other sources and opposite examples;
• Questions to be answered:
• What are the strengths and weaknesses of arguments?
• How well do empirical material and analysis hang together?
• How consistent is the argument, what objections could be raised?

 

3. Conclusion

• Concluding statement summarize your review of the article;
• What and how does this work contribute to the field?
• What limitations does it possess?