Waltz Kenneth Structural Realism After Cold War

1000-1200 words. ONLY USE THE PDF INCLUDED AS REFERENCE. Guideline is included as a word document.

Waltz Kenneth Structural Realism After Cold War Article

Basic Features

  • It lengths should be between 1,000 to 1,200 words;
  • It should be word-processed on A4 format paper;
  • It should be 1.5 spaced reader-friendly Time Romans font (12 pt);
  • Pages should be numbered;
  • It should include a cover page with UNYT logo, title of article review, the name of the student, the date, the month, and academic year;


Save your time - order a paper!

Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

Article Review’s Steps

Step 1: Read the article in its entirety

Note the following:

  • What is the central question or issue the article addresses?
  • What is the article’s argument or thesis?
  • How is the article organized to support this thesis?


Step 2: Evaluate the Article

Consider the following questions:

  • How and what does this work help us to understand about an issue?
  • What types of evidence does the author draw on to support his/her argument?
  • What theoretical perspective does the author work from? How does this shape of affect his/her argument?



Step 3: Write the Review

An article review is an opportunity to critically evaluate a coherent piece of work in its entirety;

It should be structured around the following elements:

  1. Introduction;
  2. Main Body: Evaluation/Analysis;
  3. Conclusion.


  1. Introduction
  • Introduction should be a concise summary of the article’s most important arguments,
  • Open with general description of topic/problem addressed in the work;
  • Background: question or topic addressed.


  1. Main body: Evaluation/Analysis

This section should form the bulk of your review.

  • It should be a critical evaluation of the arguments, theoretical framework, and empirical examples used in the article;
  • State your opinion by providing a reasoned argument,
  • Backed up by reference to other sources and opposite examples;
  • Questions to be answered:
  • What are the strengths and weaknesses of arguments?
  • How well do empirical material and analysis hang together?
  • How consistent is the argument, what objections could be raised?


  1. Conclusion
  • Concluding statement summarize your review of the article;
  • What and how does this work contribute to the field?
  • What limitations does it possess?