Discuss stylistically appropriate writing strategies for various audiences, subjects, and purposes

effective.The project has one milestone, which will scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. This milestone will be submitted in Module 3. The final submission is due in Module 5.In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:• Discuss stylistically appropriate writing strategies for various audiences, subjects, and purposes • Identify main ideas, supporting evidence, and conclusions through critical analysis for utilizing these components in one’s own writing • Interpret the writing process as a means for generating ideas, drafting, and revising for improving the quality and effectiveness of one’s own writing • Integrate appropriate and qualified evidence into one’s own composition through effective researchPrompt For this writing plan, you will analyze a reading and develop a claim about the intent of that reading. Once your claim is established, you will use examples from the reading to support your claim throughout your writing plan.Critical ElementsSpecifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:I. Writing Plan: Use this writing plan as a way to gather your thoughts and determine your strategy for writing your critical analysis essay. This process will allow you to develop a potential structure for effectively communicating and supporting your claim. This plan will be helpful in keeping your thought process on track when you begin writing and revising your essay. A. Determine the author’s claim that you will address in your analysis essay. In other words, what do you believe is the author’s main argument? B. Determine the author’s key points and reasoning that will be helpful in supporting your claim. C. Explain who your audience is that you intend to convince with your essay and what challenges you may have in supporting your claim to this audience. D. Explain what your goal is that you hope to accomplish with this essay, ensuring it is aligned with your claim. For example, you may disagree with the author and wish to show why they are incorrect, or you may agree but want to prove his or her claim further. E. What aspects of your claim would most benefit with supporting evidence? Be sure to find evidence from the text to support your opinion. F. Describe the revision strategy you plan on utilizing while revising your essay, being as specific as possible as to which elements of your essay you will revise and when. G. Describe how you believe your essay will benefit from receiving feedback from an outside party. Be sure to identify your writing weaknesses that would benefit from feedback.Assignment 1, Milestone 1: Writing Plan Draft In Module 3, you will submit your Writing Plan Draft containing your initial plan for writing your essay. This assignment will be graded with the Assignment 1, Milestone 1 Rubric.Assignment 1 Submission: Finalized Writing Plan In Module 5, you will submit your writing plan in its final form. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements (above) associated with Assignment 1. This assignment will be graded using the Assignment 1 Rubric.Assignment 1 Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your finalized writing plan must be 1–2 pages in length. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. This assignment will be completed through the interactive activity provided in your MindEdge eLearning materials and then submitted within the course.Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value Writing Plan: Author’s ClaimMeets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates an astute ability to discern and clearly articulate an author’s claim Determines the author’s claim that will be addressed in the analysis essay Determines the author’s claim that will be addressed in the analysis essay, but determination is cursory or does not appear to be from one of the provided articles Does not determine the author’s claim to be addressed in the analysis essay 10.67 Writing Plan: Author’s Key PointsMeets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates an astute ability to discern and clearly articulate what support will be necessary Determines the author’s key points and reasoning that will be helpful in supporting their claim Identifies perceived key points and reasoning, but not all would be helpful in supporting their claim Does not determine the author’s key points and reasoning that would be helpful in supporting their claim 10.66 Writing Plan: AudienceMeets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates an insightful awareness of the intended audience’s mindset Explains who the intended audience is and potential challenges they may encounter in supporting their claim to this audience Explains who the intended audience is and potential challenges they may encounter in supporting their claim to this audience, but explanation is cursory or not all obvious challenges were identified Does not explain who the intended audience is 10.67 Writing Plan: Your GoalMeets “Proficient” criteria and explanation provides clear insight to the essay’s intention Explains the goal to be accomplished through the essay Explains the goal to be accomplished through the essay, but the goal is not aligned with the established claim Does not explain the goal to be accomplished through the essay 10.66 Writing Plan: EvidenceMeets “Proficient” criteria and demonstrates an astute ability to discern and clearly articulate where evidence will be necessary Determines aspects that would benefit with supporting evidence Determines aspects that would benefit with supporting evidence, but not all identified areas would aid in proving their claim Does not determine aspects that would benefit with supporting evidence 32 Writing Plan: Revision StrategyMeets “Proficient” criteria and description is exceptionally clear and contextualized Describes, in detail, the planned revision strategy Describes the planned revision strategy, but description is cursory, lacks detail, or is not feasible Does not describe the planned revision strategy 10.67Writing Plan: FeedbackMeets “Proficient” criteria and description demonstrates an insightful awareness of personal weaknesses regarding writingDescribes how their essay would benefit from receiving feedback, identifying specific weaknesses that would benefit through feedbackDescribes how their essay would benefit from receiving feedback, but description is cursory or does not identify specific weaknessesDoes not describe how their essay would benefit from receiving feedback10.67Articulation of ResponseSubmission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-toread formatSubmission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organizationSubmission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideasSubmission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas4Total 1