If you could change any three aspects of contemporary constitutional law, including judicial decisions and judicial review, what would they be and why?

Assignment Question # 7 (1 Page)

Students are expected to prepare no more than 1 full page concise written response to each of the questions posed.

1 – Having read the book, if you could change any three aspects of contemporary constitutional law, including judicial decisions and judicial review, what would they be and why?

2 – Do you think posing a tension between constitutional contractarianism and public administrative instrumentalism correctly explains how administrative law fits into contemporary US constitutional government? Why or why not?

3 – Does the rise of “e-government” portend a degree of greater democratic participation in administrative decision making? Why or why not?

4 – Devise a hypothetical situation in which disgruntled voters utilize the process of initiative and referendum to reverse policies established through agency rule-making.

5 – Devise a hypothetical situation in which disgruntled voters utilize administrative administrative law to reverse a policy proposed by the following past and current elected officials. (Examples could include, but are not limited to, Trump’s Border Wall, Sanders Breakup of the Large Banks, Clinton’s Debt-Free Public College or Cruz’s Abolishment of the IRS.)

The post If you could change any three aspects of contemporary constitutional law, including judicial decisions and judicial review, what would they be and why? appeared first on Essay Quoll.