Non Profit Research Paper

Topic: Non Profit Research Paper. S‌‍‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‍‍‍elect a social or public program in a public or nonprofit agency, and then conduct an evaluation assessment. Students can choose their own organization as long as they are okay with reporting the results (outcome) to their colleagues. The outcome is to inform program managers and stakeholders whether the results of this evaluation assessment support a decision to proceed with an actual evaluation – in short, assess if the program is ready to undergo a full evaluation by outside investigators or auditors. For example, some problems may be best addressed through a needs assessment while others might suggest a demonstration project. You will decide upon the appropriate type of evaluation (through informed reading, of course), then present in a report format, results from past studies (literature review), your suggested evaluation strategy and reasons for it. You must defend your methodology, but also recognize and critique the potential disadvantages and flaws. Please keep in mind that you are assessing if a program can be evaluated and you must propose what type of evaluation can be conducted – process, outcome, or impact or perhaps the program is in its infancy and you might propose ways to collect information for an on-going evaluation. Your results might indicate that more work is necessary before an evaluation can be conducted, and therefore, your report must demonstrate that through research on the program (via primary and secondary data) and appropriate strategies. You are also expected to create a logic model that describes inputs, activities, outputs, and potential or actual outcomes (initial, intermediate, and long-term). You will conduct the scoping activities but will only propose the evaluation; you are not expected to conduct the actual evaluation itself. Some guidelines that you might consider: 1. Clients for the evaluation? Stakeholders? 2. Questions and issues driving the research? 3. Resources available? 4. Logic of the program? 5. Environmental issues? 6. Feasible research design? 7. Data available? 8. Evaluation strategy? 9. Should the evaluation be undertaken? Why? 10. Detailed recommendations. To sum up, first, introduce the program and your research question; second, review the academic literature (at least 5 academic sources) relevant to the program; third, discuss your research methodology; fourth, discuss the program in detail by collecting data from primary and secondary sources; fifth, discuss your findings from the research on the program; sixth, based on your findings, propose what type of evaluation would be feasible for this program and provide your justifications; and finally, conclude by reiterating your findings and recommendations and incl‌‍‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‍‍‍ude your learning points from this exercise. Below is a detailed description of the report requirements. The final report of 10 -11pages max (excluding Executive Summary, Content Table, References and Appendices) must follow these guidelines: 1. Project title. 2. Executive summary, briefly summarizing sections 5(a), 6, 7, and 8 from below. 3. Introduction & Background: Include information on the context around the program, information on your primary client and stakeholders, and the purpose of your project. Draw a logic model representing the program theory and/or describe/depict the causal model. 4. Literature Review: Findings from the literature on your program or similar programs, or on the social problem, or on the need for your program (at least five relevant academic reports, articles, books, or other sources), with complete references. Emphasis should be on scholarly reports, books, and articles, and not on magazines, websites, and newspapers. 5. Objectives, scope, and methodology (Research Design): a. Questions answered by the evaluation assessment study, including at least one question focusing on policy or program outcomes b. The data collected to answer each question c. The data sources d. Data collection procedures e. Evidence as to the validity, reliability, and credibility of the data; and f. The data analysis methods used to answer each question 6. Findings in detail, including relevant tables, charts, or graphs. Also include limitations of evaluating the program? How can you overcome these limitations? 7. Recommendations (including likely costs and consequences of implementing the evaluation). 8. Conclusion: a. Communication of the findings and any recommendations to the primary client and other stakeholders; & how will you encourage the use of the evaluation assessment information by the clients? b. Discussion on the likely or actual uses of the evaluation information. c. Discussions on lessons learned from this exercise; overall experience; knowledge gained (should be included in the presentation). 9. References 10. Appendices: 11. Appendix A – Copies of data collection instruments used in your project. Appendix B: Anything else that you would include in your report (diagrams; tables; etc) but due to space limitations you are including them here with appropriate reference. Formatting: Follow the APA style of writing and formatting with appropriate titles and Reference section. The report must be in 12 point Times New Roman font, 1 inch margins on all sides, 10-11 pages in length (excluding title page, executive summary, content table, references, and appendices). Grading rubric provided on Ca‌‍‍‍‍‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌‍‍‍‍‍‍nvas.

Click here to request for this assignment help

Detailed Instructions

Download | 

The post Non Profit Research Paper appeared first on My academic Support.