In 2019, three mountain lions were found feeding on human remains in Pima Canyon. The mother and her two cubs were killed. This sparked a controversy putting Arizona Game and Fish against the public which largely disagreed with their reasoning and their decision. First, read the following 2 papers Dickman, A., Marchini, S. and Manfredo, M., 2013. The human dimension in addressing conflict with large carnivores. Key topics in conservation biology, 2(1), pp.110-126.

cPenteriani, V., Delgado, M., Pinchera, F. et al. Human behaviour can trigger large carnivore attacks in developed countries. Sci Rep 6, 20552 (2016) doi:10.1038/srep20552)
Then, summarize the main concerns that give rise to conflicts between humans and large carnivores.
Next evaluate three ways one or both papers suggest mitigating carnivore-human conflict? Do you agree or disagree with all, some, and/or none of these approaches. Fully justify and explain your answer using information from the readings and additional peer-reviewer outside sources (No technical reports or popular media articles permitted.) Please review the library tutorial if you are uncertain what constitutes peer-reviewed primary literature. Research the mountain lion event and determine whether the killings were justified, unjustified, or you are uncertain. You must fully explain your rationale using information from the readings and other peer-reviewed sources. (No technical reports or popular media articles permitted.) Please review the library tutorial if you are uncertain what constitutes peer-reviewed primary literature. Lastly, what aspects of human attitudes, experience, and behavior do you think contribute to continued conflict? Fully explain your answer using information from the readings and other sources as needed.
Remember to cite external sources in the text and fully at the end.