Your answer (to each question) should not exceed one page (double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 font). Write in complete sentences (point form is not acceptable). Answers exceeding the one-page limit shall be disregarded be concise. PLEASE BE AS ACCURATE AND CORRECT AS POSSIBLE. I HAVE ATTACHED ALL OF THE NECESSARY READINGS FOR INFORMATION.

Your answer (to each question) should not exceed one page (double-spaced, Times New Roman 12 font). Write in complete sentences (point form is not acceptable). Answers exceeding the one-page limit shall be disregarded; be concise. PLEASE BE AS ACCURATE AND CORRECT AS POSSIBLE. I HAVE ATTACHED ALL OF THE NECESSARY READINGS FOR INFORMATION.
Important – your answers should demonstrate that you understand the subject and should be in your own words (cut and paste, quoting source material, hyperlinks, etc. are NOT acceptable); your answer should also include the relevant case law (if applicable) – not the complete citation, just the name of the case is sufficient as in, for example:
‘As outlined in Sparrow the right to fish . . .’
Below are sample questions; I shall select 4 questions from the list, plus one ‘surprise’ question.
Exam questions:
1. In the context of a duty to consult, discuss what is meant by ‘veto’ and ‘consent’?
2. How is a ‘duty to consult’ triggered? Explain with reference to relevant case law?
3. Are First Nations obligated to participate in the consultation process? Explain
4. Compare and contrast ‘infringement’ and ‘extinguishment’ in the context of aboriginal title and rights?
5. What are Gladue rights and how do they apply? Discuss with reference to Section 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code of Canada.
6. Why is Canada negotiating modern treaties (discuss with reference to the situation in BC)?